In the dead of night, Venezuelan President and his spouse were forcefully taken from their beds and transported via helicopters by U.S. Special Forces.
The legality of such actions under the Trump administration raises questions. It is not permissible to enter foreign territories, apprehend their leaders, and subject them to trials in domestic courts without consequences.
Contrary to popular belief, the motive behind this operation seems to be more related to oil than drugs. While Venezuela is not a primary source of illicit drugs globally, it boasts substantial oil reserves, with 303 billion barrels, making it a coveted target.
Recent pardons issued by President Trump, such as that of former Honduran President Hernandez, who was convicted in the U.S. for drug trafficking, raise doubts about the consistency of his drug-related actions in South America.
The narrative of reclaiming “stolen oil” from Venezuela echoes through Trump’s statements and actions, emphasizing the strategic importance of the country’s vast oil reserves.
International norms and post-World War II principles emphasize the prohibition of powerful nations exploiting smaller countries for resources or interfering with their governance.
While Trump justifies his actions by claiming Venezuela falls within his “sphere of influence,” concerns are raised about potential ripple effects, with other global powers reevaluating their own spheres of influence and territorial claims.